SUCCESS AND GRADUATION OF STUDENTS FROM LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS

Objective: Atatürk University is committed to ensuring that students from the lowest 20% of household income nationally not only gain access to higher education but also succeed in completing their studies. This policy reflects our mission to combat intergenerational poverty and to guarantee equitable opportunities for all students, regardless of their financial background.

Scope and Methodology:

  • Monitoring is conducted annually at the faculty level, covering admission, retention/progression, and graduation indicators.

  • Data are drawn from ATAUNİ-OBS (the university’s student information system) and verified through institutional reporting.

  • Reports are submitted to the University Senate to guide evidence-based interventions.

  • The definition of “lowest 20% income households” follows national quintile standards and is validated through bursary records and student declarations.

University-wide Key Figure (2024):

  • Proportion of students from the lowest 20% of household income: 17.2% of the total student body.

  • Graduation and retention rates are calculated based on program-specific durations (4, 5, or 6 years, depending on the faculty).


Faculty-Based Graduation Indicators (2024)

Faculty % of Students from Lowest 20% Income Retention Rate (%) Graduation Rate (%) Avg. Time to Graduation (years) Notes
Faculty of Education 21% 85% 72% 4.2 Strong social support, high demand for teaching programs
Faculty of Engineering 15% 78% 65% 4.8 Extra tutoring and mentoring introduced
Faculty of Medicine 9% 90% 70% 6.2 National standard completion time
Faculty of Agriculture 26% 83% 74% 4.4 Strong integration with rural outreach programs
Faculty of Arts and Sciences 19% 80% 68% 4.5 Broadest student population
Faculty of Economics & Administrative Sciences 22% 77% 66% 4.3 Financial aid prioritized in this faculty
Faculty of Theology 24% 84% 71% 4.2 High retention, strong community support
Faculty of Fine Arts 17% 76% 64% 4.5 Vulnerable to dropouts due to living costs
Faculty of Dentistry 11% 88% 69% 5.6 Aligned with national program length
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine 20% 79% 67% 5.0 New bursary program launched in 2023
University Average 17.2% 82% 68% 4.6

Support Mechanisms

  • Academic Support: mentoring, tutoring, peer-led study groups.

  • Social & Psychological Services: counseling and peer networks.

  • Financial Support: scholarships, meal subsidies, housing aid, emergency funds.

  • Employment Opportunities: on-campus part-time jobs, internships, local partnerships.

Equity Gap Analysis

Graduation rates are compared annually across faculties to identify gaps. Additional support—such as targeted scholarships, extra tutoring hours, and faculty-level bursary schemes—is introduced where performance is lower, especially in Engineering and Fine Arts.

Transparency & Evidence

  • Faculty-level data tables and methodology notes are published online in PDF/HTML formats, accessible until at least the next submission cycle.

  • Year of reference: 2024.

  • Clear explanations of definitions, indicators, and formulas are provided to ensure international comparability.